From Garrison State to Nation-State political power and the Russian military under Gorbachev and Yeltsin

Why has the military not intervened in the post-communist political arena since the advent of democracy in Russia? Do lowered levels of professionalism actually lead to higher levels of intervention? Through a systematic exploration of professionalism within the Russian military, this study addresse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Moran, John P.
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Westport, CT Praeger c2002
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Call Number :JN 6693.5. C58 M67 2002

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 a 4500
001 17927
003 MY-KLNDU
005 20241218061007.0
008 150821 2002 ctua bi 000 0 eng d
020 |a 0275972178 
039 9 |a 201508211523  |b azraai  |c 201508211517  |d azraai  |y 200910090957  |z VLOAD 
040 |a UPNM 
090 |a JN 6693.5. C58  |b M67 2002 
100 1 |a Moran, John P. 
245 1 0 |a From Garrison State to Nation-State  |b political power and the Russian military under Gorbachev and Yeltsin  |c John P. Moran 
260 |a Westport, CT  |b Praeger  |c c2002 
300 |a x, 236 p.  |b ill.  |c 24 cm 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index 
505 0 |a 1. Understanding Democratization and Civil-Military Relations in Communist and Post-Communist Russia; -- 2. Democratization and Russian Military Politics; -- 3. The Structures of National Security: The Military and the Power Ministries; -- 4. The Russian Military and Foreign Policy; -- 5. Democratization and the Military in Russian Society; -- 6. The Mischiefs of Faction: Removing the Causes or Controlling Its Effects? 
520 |a Why has the military not intervened in the post-communist political arena since the advent of democracy in Russia? Do lowered levels of professionalism actually lead to higher levels of intervention? Through a systematic exploration of professionalism within the Russian military, this study addresses these important questions. Moran suggests that by examining the notion of subjective fragmentation, both Gorbachev and Yeltsin utilized a highly effective, yet potentially troublesome, form of civil-military control. Findings that overall levels of praetorian behavior on the part of the Russian military have declined in this period, in spite of declining levels of military professionalism, challenge one of the most basic theoretical assumptions of civil-military relations. 
650 0 |a Civil-military relations  |z Russia (Federation) 
650 0 |a Democratization  |z Russia (Federation) 
651 0 |a Russia (Federation)  |x Politics and government  |y 1991- 
999 |a vtls000017835  |c 17927  |d 17927