Crime and culpability a theory of criminal law

This book presents a comprehensive overview of what the criminal law would look like if organized around the principle that those who deserve punishment should receive punishment commensurate with, but no greater than, that which they deserve. Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan argue that d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alexander, Larry 1943-
Other Authors: Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler 1971-, Morse, Stephen J.
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Cambridge, [U.K.] Cambridge University Press 2009
Series:Cambridge introductions to philosophy and law
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000 a 4500
001 40874
003 MY-KLNDU
005 20241219003429.0
008 101027s2009 xxk 001 0 eng d
020 |a 9780521518772 (hbk.) 
020 |a 9780521739610 (pbk.) 
039 9 |a 201509011029  |b azraai  |c 201110311536  |d rafizah  |y 201010271027  |z helmey 
040 |a UPNM 
090 |a K 5103  |b .A44 2009 
100 1 |a Alexander, Larry  |d 1943- 
245 1 0 |a Crime and culpability  |b a theory of criminal law  |c by Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan ; with contributions by Stephen J. Morse 
260 |a Cambridge, [U.K.]  |b Cambridge University Press  |c 2009 
300 |a xiii, 358 p.  |c 24 cm. 
490 1 |a Cambridge introductions to philosophy and law 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (p. 331-348) and index 
520 |a This book presents a comprehensive overview of what the criminal law would look like if organized around the principle that those who deserve punishment should receive punishment commensurate with, but no greater than, that which they deserve. Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan argue that desert is a function of the actor's culpability, and that culpability is a function of the risks of harm to protected interests that the actor believes he is imposing and his reasons for acting in the face of those risks. The authors deny that resultant harms, as well as unperceived risks, affect the actor's desert. They thus reject punishment for inadvertent negligence as well as for intentions or preparatory acts that are not risky. Alexander and Ferzan discuss the reasons for imposing risks that negate or mitigate culpability, the individuation of crimes, and omissions. They conclude with a discussion of rules versus standards in criminal law and offer a description of the shape of criminal law in the event that the authors' conceptualization is put into practice. 
592 |a 00002849  |b 12/10/2011  |c RM277.95  |h Pustaka Darul Warisan 
650 0 |a Punishment  |x Philosophy 
650 0 |a Criminal law  |x Philosophy 
650 0 |a Criminal law  |z United States  |x Philosophy 
700 1 |a Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler  |d 1971- 
700 1 |a Morse, Stephen J. 
830 0 |a Cambridge introductions to philosophy and law 
999 |a vtls000041310  |c 40874  |d 40874