Who lost Russia? an enquiry into the failure of the Russian-Western partnership

An enlarged NATO, forced to consider how to defend its new members from possible Russian aggression, is set for an 'unavoidable clash' of interests with Russia transfixed by Cold War logic that still harbours 'imperial ambitions'. In this report, Dr Eyal challenges the growing co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eyal, Jonathan
Corporate Author: Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Abingdon, UK RUSI 2009
Series:Whitehall paper series 71
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000 a 4500
001 47173
003 MY-KLNDU
005 20241219005108.0
008 121031 2009 xxk b 000 0 eng d
022 |a 0268-1307 
039 9 |y 201210310939  |z azraai 
040 |a UPNM 
090 |a UA 10.5  |b .E93 2009 
100 1 |a Eyal, Jonathan 
245 1 0 |a Who lost Russia?  |b an enquiry into the failure of the Russian-Western partnership  |c Jonathan Eyal 
260 |a Abingdon, UK  |b RUSI  |c 2009 
300 |a v, 112 p.  |c 24 p. 
490 1 |a Whitehall paper  |v 71 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index 
520 |a An enlarged NATO, forced to consider how to defend its new members from possible Russian aggression, is set for an 'unavoidable clash' of interests with Russia transfixed by Cold War logic that still harbours 'imperial ambitions'. In this report, Dr Eyal challenges the growing consensus that the West is responsible for missing a historic opportunity to engage Russia, by allegedly failing to appreciate the full depth of Russia's aspirations and feelings. 
651 0 |a Russia (Federation)  |x History  |y 1991- 
651 0 |a United States  |x Foreign relations  |z Russia (Federation) 
651 0 |a Russia (Federation)  |x Foreign relations  |z United States 
710 2 |a Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies 
830 0 |a Whitehall paper series  |v 71 
999 |a vtls000047677  |c 47173  |d 47173