Context and circumstance the Turkish military and politics

Debates about military influence on civilian government tend to be partisan and rarely pay sufficient attention to specific contexts. This paper analyses, without condemnation or justification, why and how the military exercises such influence in Turkey and whether it is likely to continue to do so....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jenkins, Gareth
Corporate Author: International Institute for Strategic Studies
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Oxford University Press International Institute for Strategic Studies 2001
Series:Adelphi paper 337
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000 a 4500
001 49323
003 MY-KLNDU
005 20241219005702.0
008 130829 2001 xxk i 000 0 eng d
020 |a 0198509715 
039 9 |a 201405152240  |b zul  |c 201401081614  |d azraai  |y 201308291219  |z azraai 
040 |a UPNM 
090 |a JF 195  |b .J46 2001 
100 1 |a Jenkins, Gareth 
245 1 0 |a Context and circumstance  |b the Turkish military and politics  |c Gareth Jenkins 
260 |a Oxford, UK  |b Oxford University Press  |b International Institute for Strategic Studies  |c 2001 
300 |a 104 p.  |c 24 cm. 
490 1 |a Adelphi paper  |x 0567-932X  |v 337 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references 
505 |a Military and Turkish society -- Turkish officer corps -- How the Turkish military influences policy -- Turkish military's impact on policy. 
520 |a Debates about military influence on civilian government tend to be partisan and rarely pay sufficient attention to specific contexts. This paper analyses, without condemnation or justification, why and how the military exercises such influence in Turkey and whether it is likely to continue to do so. It argues that the role of the military in Turkey grows out of a specific Turkish context and is more a symptom than a cause of the country's flawed democracy. It examines the Turkish officer ethos, particularly the role of the indigenous ideology of Kemalism, and the broad, though not universal, public mandate for an interventionist role in politics. It contends that the military's influence is neither uniform nor total and that it is more effective at blocking than initiating policy; thus creating a system in which civilian authority is primary rather than supreme. It analyses the mechanisms through which the military attempts to shape policy, and demonstrates how its influence depends more on its informal authority than legislated rights or responsibilities. The paper suggests that fears of threats to national security resulting from the reforms required for EU accession have made the military more, not less, reluctant to withdraw from the political arena. It concludes that, regardless of the future of Turkey's candidacy, such a withdrawal will be a slow and gradual process, dependent more on changes in Turkish social and political culture and the perceived security environment than in the military itself. 
592 |b 19/9/13  |c RM94.84  |h BL 
650 0 |a Civil-military relations  |z Turkey 
651 0 |a Turkey  |x Armed Forces  |x Political activity 
651 0 |a Turkey  |x Politics and government  |y 1980- 
710 2 |a International Institute for Strategic Studies 
830 1 |a Adelphi paper  |v 337 
999 |a vtls000050008  |c 49323  |d 49323