War and self-defense
When is it right to go to war? The most persuasive answer to this question has always been 'in self-defence'. David Rodin shows what's wrong with this answer. He proposes a comprehensive new theory of the right of self-defence which resolves many of the perplexing questions that have...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Oxford, UK
Clarendon Press
2002
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 99019 | ||
| 003 | MY-KLNDU | ||
| 005 | 20241220023032.0 | ||
| 008 | 221104 2002 xxka bi 000 0 eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780199275410 | ||
| 039 | 9 | |a 202211041126 |b VLOAD |c 201411201710 |d azraai |y 201410271134 |z hasniza | |
| 040 | |a UPNM |b eng |c UPNM |e rda | ||
| 090 | |a KZ 4043 |b .R63 2002 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Rodin, David |e author | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a War and self-defense |c David Rodin |
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford, UK |b Clarendon Press |c 2002 | |
| 300 | |a xvi, 213 pages |b illustrations |c 22 cm | ||
| 336 | |a text |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a unmediated |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a volume |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Introduction: The argument -- The status of moral claims -- War and consequentialism -- Part I: Self-defense -- Rights -- Hohfeld's building blocks -- Logical structure of rights -- Having a right and being in the right -- Justification and excuse -- Model of defensive rights -- A three-legged stool -- Defense as a derivative right -- Limits on the right: necessity, imminence, proportionality -- Bounds of proportionality -- Consequences and forced choice -- The lesser evil -- Forced choice -- The resilience of responsibility -- Grounding self-defense in rights -- Forfeiture and rights of limited scope -- The role of fault -- Innocent threats and innocent aggressors -- Objective wrongdoing -- Moral subjects -- Variety of excuses -- Part II: National-defense -- International law -- National-defense in international law -- Limits of the right -- Need for a normative foundation -- War and defense of persons -- Two levels of war -- Reductive strategy -- Imminent and conditional threats -- War and the protection of persons -- War and the common life -- Political association -- The character of common lives -- Communal integrity and self-determination -- Myth of descrete communities -- War, responsibility, and law enforcement -- Paradox in the just war theory -- Responsibility of soldiers -- War and law enforcement -- Argument for a universal state -- Conclusion: Morality and realism. | |
| 520 | |a When is it right to go to war? The most persuasive answer to this question has always been 'in self-defence'. David Rodin shows what's wrong with this answer. He proposes a comprehensive new theory of the right of self-defence which resolves many of the perplexing questions that have dogged both jurists and philosophers. | ||
| 592 | |a 0007/UPNM |b 13/11/14 |c RM 169.58 |h Ridha | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Self-defense (International law) | |
| 650 | 0 | |a War (International law) | |
| 999 | |a vtls000053113 |c 99019 |d 99019 | ||